Our publishing standard
ROHOVOT publishes educational material to help readers understand risks, preserve information and decide when qualified assistance may be appropriate. Content must be clear, relevant to the stated topic and honest about uncertainty, limitations and jurisdiction. It is general information, not legal advice or a promise of any investigative, recovery or litigation outcome.
Research and verification
Material claims should be checked against appropriate primary sources, established technical documentation or applicable public guidance. We do not invent clients, cases, statistics, quotations, credentials or results. Illustrative scenarios must be identified as illustrations and must not imply a real engagement.
Use of automation
Automation and generative tools may assist with topic organization, outlines or initial drafts. Automated output is not treated as verified expertise. New material must remain outside the public article index until it has passed editorial, factual, relevance and duplication review.
Authorship and accountability
Organization-authored material is labeled “ROHOVOT Editorial Team.” That byline identifies ROHOVOT as the publisher and responsible editorial entity; it is not a fictional person. Where an individual author or reviewer is named, the attribution must be accurate and supported by a real profile.
Updates and corrections
Substantive articles should display publication and meaningful review dates. A modified date is changed only when the content receives a material update. If an error is identified, we correct it promptly and revise or withdraw content that is no longer reliable.
Editorial contact
To report a potential error or request clarification, email info@rohovot.com with the page URL and the issue you identified.